Farm Subsidy information
18th District of Florida
(Rep. Brian Mast)
Total Subsidies in 18th District of Florida (Rep. Brian Mast), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 638
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 18th District of Florida (Rep. Brian Mast) totaled $100,018,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evans Properties Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $6,804,261 |
| 2 | Premier Citrus LLC | Wilson, AR 72395 | $4,616,563 |
| 3 | Bernard A Egan Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $3,227,275 |
| 4 | Blue Goose Growers LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $2,655,657 |
| 5 | Running W Citrus | Fort Myers, FL 33916 | $2,574,518 |
| 6 | Emerald Grove LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $2,518,112 |
| 7 | Kennedy Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $2,432,158 |
| 8 | Graves Brothers Company | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $2,406,023 |
| 9 | Wescott Groves LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $2,348,001 |
| 10 | Scott Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $1,978,758 |
| 11 | Vero Producers Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $1,945,576 |
| 12 | Star Farms Corp | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $1,890,128 |
| 13 | Greene Groves And Ranch Lllp | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $1,555,763 |
| 14 | Img Citrus Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $1,540,014 |
| 15 | Edsall Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $1,533,056 |
| 16 | Adams Ranch Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34979 | $1,530,653 |
| 17 | Horizons Aquisition 5 | Port St Lucie, FL 34986 | $1,474,200 |
| 18 | Riverland And Indian Sun Lc | Wauchula, FL 33873 | $1,458,850 |
| 19 | Thomas Produce Company Inc | Boca Raton, FL 33496 | $1,358,920 |
| 20 | Duda St Lucie Grove LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $1,162,038 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf