Total Conservation Programs in 18th District of Florida (Rep. Brian Mast), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 56
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 18th District of Florida (Rep. Brian Mast) totaled $1,198,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Premier Citrus LLC | Wilson, AR 72395 | $367,500 |
2 | Edsall Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $106,500 |
3 | Adams Ranch Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34979 | $50,000 |
4 | Robert Bowden | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $50,000 |
5 | A&g Groves Inc | Wabasso, FL 32970 | $48,177 |
6 | A Wallace Moore Jr | Bethesda, MD 20816 | $47,777 |
7 | E B Conoley II | Winter Garden, FL 34777 | $36,575 |
8 | Vero Producers Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $31,678 |
9 | Horizon Tree Farm Lc | Vero Beach, FL 32962 | $31,263 |
10 | David E Roffey | Lee, FL 32059 | $26,447 |
11 | Kanawha Groves | Fort Pierce, FL 34948 | $25,726 |
12 | Marie Mauney | Raleigh, NC 27609 | $21,724 |
13 | Peter D Spyke | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $20,060 |
14 | Helseth Corporation | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $19,136 |
15 | Brian M Weaver | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $18,426 |
16 | Hwy 68 Partnership | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $17,500 |
17 | Michael Norton | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $16,620 |
18 | Sara Rich | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $16,619 |
19 | Emery C Etter Jr | Chambersburg, PA 17201 | $16,482 |
20 | Alco Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $15,750 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>