Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Iowa
(Rep. Abby Finkenauer)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Iowa (Rep. Abby Finkenauer), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 7,509
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Iowa (Rep. Abby Finkenauer) totaled $242,270,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Willow Bend LLC | Garnavillo, IA 52049 | $1,339,325 |
| 2 | County Line Livestock LLC | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $1,325,710 |
| 3 | Pork Chop Hill Farms Inc | Sherrill, IA 52073 | $1,181,751 |
| 4 | G & W Grain & Livestock Inc | Quasqueton, IA 52326 | $1,170,065 |
| 5 | De Su Holsteins LLC | New Albin, IA 52160 | $1,057,593 |
| 6 | Knuth Farms Inc | Cascade, IA 52033 | $968,582 |
| 7 | Hillside Partners LLC | Winthrop, IA 50682 | $866,919 |
| 8 | Ajc Recker Cattle Co LLC | Dyersville, IA 52040 | $808,537 |
| 9 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $781,512 |
| 10 | Mormann Dairy LLC | New Vienna, IA 52065 | $769,632 |
| 11 | Distant View Farms LLC | Monona, IA 52159 | $768,499 |
| 12 | Agri Vest Inc | Earlville, IA 52041 | $762,757 |
| 13 | Burco Farms Partnership | Independence, IA 50644 | $762,030 |
| 14 | Regancrest Holsteins, LLC | Waukon, IA 52172 | $732,495 |
| 15 | Cbl Farms Inc | Winthrop, IA 50682 | $731,260 |
| 16 | Kluesner Feeders, LLC | Manchester, IA 52057 | $704,106 |
| 17 | Kruse Dairy Farm LLC | Dyersville, IA 52040 | $681,722 |
| 18 | Reuter Dairy Inc | Peosta, IA 52068 | $677,915 |
| 19 | Pork Chop Hill Farms III Inc | Sherrill, IA 52073 | $662,327 |
| 20 | S & C Pork Inc | Saint Olaf, IA 52072 | $658,721 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf