Direct Payment Program in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 15,565
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $399,168,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Joe Dent | Humeston, IA 50123 | $262,209 |
202 | Thomas Dent | Humeston, IA 50123 | $262,208 |
203 | Matthew M Stocker | Albia, IA 52531 | $262,208 |
204 | Jim Buesing | Stockton, IA 52769 | $262,052 |
205 | Kenneth George Helt | New London, IA 52645 | $261,688 |
206 | Norman Allen Vote | Melrose, IA 52569 | $261,417 |
207 | Rouw Farms Inc | Ottumwa, IA 52501 | $260,616 |
208 | Vandenberg Farms Inc | Donnellson, IA 52625 | $260,186 |
209 | Merlin D Bell | Leon, IA 50144 | $259,230 |
210 | Flat Ridge Farms Inc | Oakville, IA 52646 | $258,922 |
211 | Blackhawk Farms | Richland, IA 52585 | $258,858 |
212 | Holtkamp Corp | West Point, IA 52656 | $258,383 |
213 | Kruse Brothers Ltd | Hillsboro, IA 52630 | $258,346 |
214 | Hasenclever Farms Inc | Fort Madison, IA 52627 | $258,007 |
215 | Lamis Farms Inc | Agency, IA 52530 | $256,776 |
216 | K V Mud Creek Inc | Stockton, IA 52769 | $256,713 |
217 | Broadview Farms | Danville, IA 52623 | $256,684 |
218 | F And F Partnership | Walcott, IA 52773 | $256,106 |
219 | Lang Enterprises Inc | Donnellson, IA 52625 | $255,544 |
220 | William T Gerdes Jr | Burlington, IA 52601 | $255,297 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”