Total Disaster Programs in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 10,480
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $162,182,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Porter Family Farms | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $649,075 |
2 | Ridge Top Farms Co | Unionville, IA 52594 | $487,318 |
3 | James Matthew Beaumont | Albia, IA 52531 | $440,032 |
4 | Timothy W Hale | Bloomfield, IA 52537 | $438,146 |
5 | Wells Brothers Farms | Cincinnati, IA 52549 | $418,808 |
6 | Larry Joe Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $418,606 |
7 | Diehl Farms | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $398,480 |
8 | Triple B Farms Inc | Bloomfield, IA 52537 | $383,732 |
9 | R H & K Enterprises | Dixon, IA 52745 | $377,473 |
10 | Etcher Farms Inc | Lovilia, IA 50150 | $367,907 |
11 | Jerrie Everett Fetters | Seymour, IA 52590 | $352,666 |
12 | Davis Bros Farms Inc | Moulton, IA 52572 | $345,541 |
13 | Ronald E Joos | Bloomfield, IA 52537 | $342,665 |
14 | Dianne Ruth Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $341,206 |
15 | Daniel Joseph Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $337,356 |
16 | Ryan Leroy Bennett | Corydon, IA 50060 | $337,238 |
17 | Adam Farms | Fairfield, IA 52556 | $336,353 |
18 | James William Zaputil | Mystic, IA 52574 | $332,134 |
19 | Charles William Thomas | Indianola, IA 50125 | $318,126 |
20 | M-w Livestock Inc | Albia, IA 52531 | $310,270 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>