Total Conservation Programs in 12th District of Illinois (Rep. Mike Bost), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 207
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 12th District of Illinois (Rep. Mike Bost) totaled $684,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Sharon Gielow Revocable Trust - Sharon Gielow | Herculaneum, MO 63048 | $8,668 |
| 22 | Lisa Braun | Columbia, IL 62236 | $8,648 |
| 23 | Mark Hoffmann | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $8,512 |
| 24 | Charles T Birk Revocable Living Trust | Fults, IL 62244 | $8,063 |
| 25 | Richard W Buettner Declaration Of Trust | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $7,925 |
| 26 | Travis Honey Farms LLC | Olive Branch, IL 62969 | $7,761 |
| 27 | Stephen Faust - Stephen D & Deborah K Faust Trust | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $7,424 |
| 28 | Patricia Honey | Olive Branch, IL 62969 | $7,217 |
| 29 | Elott H Raffety Farms Inc | Wyatt, MO 63882 | $7,090 |
| 30 | Ferdinand & Betty Mcbride Family Living Trust | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $6,734 |
| 31 | Edward Fuhrman III | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $6,512 |
| 32 | Myron A Rapp Trust | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $6,267 |
| 33 | Cornelius Properties, LLC | Saint Louis, MO 63124 | $6,170 |
| 34 | David Miller | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $6,005 |
| 35 | Monroe County Extension & 4-h Foundation | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $5,925 |
| 36 | Randall Eckert | Millstadt, IL 62260 | $5,521 |
| 37 | Rosalie C Baum Revocable Living Trust | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $5,222 |
| 38 | Dale Haudrich | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $5,140 |
| 39 | Gerald Whelan | Prairie Du Rocher, IL 62277 | $5,035 |
| 40 | Seboldt Brothers | Fults, IL 62244 | $4,708 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf