Total Conservation Programs in 17th District of Illinois (Rep. Cheri Bustos), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,689

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 17th District of Illinois (Rep. Cheri Bustos) totaled $149,834,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2021
21Marvin J SchwarzHanover, IL 61041$418,723
22Dena L HawnKeithsburg, IL 61442$418,636
23Debra A JakobsenRock Island, IL 61201$415,259
24Nancy Corwith Hamill Winter TrustStockton, IL 61085$406,075
25Harold WubbenEast Dubuque, IL 61025$405,051
26Donald J WienenElizabeth, IL 61028$398,541
27James S SullivanStockton, IL 61085$393,459
28Lawrence C Lomax Self DeclarationGalena, IL 61036$392,819
29Frances L Borhart Revocable TrustIllinois City, IL 61259$377,242
30Lawfer Farm PartnershipStockton, IL 61085$374,979
31Ruthndel Bar-j Farm Inc.Bradenton, FL 34209$373,561
32Weber Beef IncGeneseo, IL 61254$363,578
33Kevin M ConwaySherrard, IL 61281$354,263
34Darryl D And Karen E Anderson Living TrustAndalusia, IL 61232$352,268
35Sharon SimsNew Windsor, IL 61465$352,088
36Harlan D HohenbokenHillsdale, IL 61257$346,681
37Boyd MeyerScales Mound, IL 61075$345,951
38George R FrederickOak Brook, IL 60523$344,938
39Sandra K WienenElizabeth, IL 61028$336,488
40Brian T ParkinsonMilan, IL 61264$334,445

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag