Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 396
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 18th District of Illinois (Rep. Darin LaHood) totaled $135,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard Eugene Ingram | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $1,422 |
22 | Danny T Barrow | Versailles, IL 62378 | $1,333 |
23 | Randy Gum | Tallula, IL 62688 | $1,220 |
24 | Reginald L Liehr | Chambersburg, IL 62323 | $1,204 |
25 | George Sheets | Huntsville, IL 62344 | $1,195 |
26 | Charles R Snyder | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $1,162 |
27 | Dean Kerr | Tallula, IL 62688 | $1,135 |
28 | Rodney E Logsdon | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $1,100 |
29 | Nathan Grosboll | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $1,084 |
30 | Robert F Kassing | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $1,075 |
31 | Ken Kerr | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $1,068 |
32 | Roberts Farms | Timewell, IL 62375 | $1,011 |
33 | Lucas S Niekamp | Camp Point, IL 62320 | $1,004 |
34 | Bradley Farming Corporation | Timewell, IL 62375 | $997 |
35 | Nathan Newton | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $962 |
36 | Denver Reische | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $960 |
37 | Kochnook Dairy Farm | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $940 |
38 | Gary G Cantrell | Clayton, IL 62324 | $922 |
39 | Luther Welty | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $913 |
40 | Louis Albert Hammer | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $857 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”