Total Commodity Programs in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,789
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 3rd District of Indiana (Rep. Jim Banks) totaled $20,752,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stoy Farms | Ashley, IN 46705 | $608,845 |
| 2 | Ternet Farms Partnership | New Haven, IN 46774 | $446,590 |
| 3 | Bowman & Bowman Farms Inc | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $263,318 |
| 4 | Walker Farms Gp | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $262,217 |
| 5 | Lori Ann Melcher | New Haven, IN 46774 | $255,648 |
| 6 | Ridenour Farms Inc | Angola, IN 46703 | $223,640 |
| 7 | Brechbill Farms Inc | Auburn, IN 46706 | $206,026 |
| 8 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $201,427 |
| 9 | Timothy Rorick | New Haven, IN 46774 | $193,622 |
| 10 | Bacon Bros Farms | New Haven, IN 46774 | $186,923 |
| 11 | Rosene Farms Inc | Monroeville, IN 46773 | $185,209 |
| 12 | Thrush Farms LLC | Garrett, IN 46738 | $174,340 |
| 13 | Schaefer Inc | Fort Wayne, IN 46818 | $157,297 |
| 14 | Salomon Farms LLC | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $151,874 |
| 15 | Brian Scott Clifford | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $138,323 |
| 16 | Kees Grain Farms | Harlan, IN 46743 | $132,380 |
| 17 | Custer Farms Inc | Garrett, IN 46738 | $132,026 |
| 18 | Robert L Delancey Jr | Angola, IN 46703 | $131,563 |
| 19 | Max A Miller | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $128,640 |
| 20 | Wyss Farms Enterprises Gp | Fort Wayne, IN 46819 | $125,617 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf