Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 731
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $4,279,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $106,628 |
2 | Denton Koehn | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $102,442 |
3 | The Bennington State Bank ** | Minneapolis, KS 67467 | $89,681 |
4 | Timothy J Berland Trust No 1 | Damar, KS 67632 | $61,074 |
5 | Rodney F Cameron | Portis, KS 67474 | $58,856 |
6 | Mongeau Farms | Stockton, KS 67669 | $49,594 |
7 | Dennis L Burt | Belleville, KS 66935 | $45,752 |
8 | Wade W Wagner | Smith Center, KS 66967 | $42,177 |
9 | Hipp Farms LLC | Claflin, KS 67525 | $37,297 |
10 | William R Weaver | Aurora, KS 67417 | $37,255 |
11 | Kyle L Blackwood | Miltonvale, KS 67466 | $35,780 |
12 | Byron Clifton Sowers | Healy, KS 67850 | $35,717 |
13 | Eric Schultze | Osborne, KS 67473 | $32,602 |
14 | Bruce Krob | Stockton, KS 67669 | $31,186 |
15 | Nicholas Z Brant | Lucas, KS 67648 | $29,075 |
16 | Brian R Schick Dba Schick Farms | Densmore, KS 67645 | $27,694 |
17 | Frisbie Wht & Hereford Farms | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $25,869 |
18 | David R Frisbie | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $25,869 |
19 | Anthony R Tobald | Glasco, KS 67445 | $25,549 |
20 | Matthew P Jarvis | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $25,103 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>