Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 16,822
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $49,853,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rome Farms | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $202,467 |
2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $180,210 |
3 | Farmway Credit Union ** | Beloit, KS 67420 | $164,473 |
4 | Spring Creek Family Farms | Wamego, KS 66547 | $159,522 |
5 | Cott Family Farms | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $145,227 |
6 | Johnson State Bank ** | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $139,487 |
7 | Winsome Farms Gp | Johnson, KS 67855 | $135,111 |
8 | Double Diamond Ag | Johnson, KS 67855 | $120,437 |
9 | R & R Unruh | Garden City, KS 67846 | $97,367 |
10 | F&f Farms Gp | Alden, KS 67512 | $97,292 |
11 | Greg Wolf | Bennington, KS 67422 | $96,494 |
12 | J & L Smith Farms Inc | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $90,038 |
13 | Byron State Bank ** | Byron, NE 68325 | $86,637 |
14 | Ritchie K Tarn - Ritchie K Tarn Rev Trust | Solomon, KS 67480 | $86,194 |
15 | Triag | Ellinwood, KS 67526 | $82,950 |
16 | Ez Farms Gp | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $81,307 |
17 | Bankwest ** | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $81,017 |
18 | C-l Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $80,124 |
19 | M & G Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $78,360 |
20 | Strauss Farms Inc | Junction City, KS 66441 | $78,164 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>