Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 28,991
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Kansas (Rep. Steve Watkins) totaled $1,259,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Flaharty Farms LLC | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $1,494,739 |
| 42 | Hillyer Farms Inc | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $1,484,461 |
| 43 | Scheckel Farms | Richmond, KS 66080 | $1,482,317 |
| 44 | Green Valley Farms | Powhattan, KS 66527 | $1,473,682 |
| 45 | Johnson Farms, Inc - Bendena | Bendena, KS 66008 | $1,473,317 |
| 46 | Brent Paddock | Mound City, KS 66056 | $1,465,706 |
| 47 | Summit Farms Inc | Morrill, KS 66515 | $1,456,540 |
| 48 | Elliott Farms Inc | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $1,446,585 |
| 49 | Wilbur Aspinwall And Sons | Nortonville, KS 66060 | $1,437,532 |
| 50 | Larmar Inc | Robinson, KS 66532 | $1,429,424 |
| 51 | Laus Creek Farm Inc | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $1,427,039 |
| 52 | Jim & Alicia Troike Living Trust | Hepler, KS 66746 | $1,422,313 |
| 53 | Max Oltjen Land & Cattle Co | Hiawatha, KS 66434 | $1,419,042 |
| 54 | Eugene L &/or Darlene L Ferguson Liv Tr | Mound Valley, KS 67354 | $1,417,547 |
| 55 | Hawk & Sons Inc %duane Hawk | Effingham, KS 66023 | $1,415,845 |
| 56 | H B J Farms Inc | White Cloud, KS 66094 | $1,413,648 |
| 57 | Heinco Inc | Fairview, KS 66425 | $1,412,813 |
| 58 | Depoe Farms Inc | Kincaid, KS 66039 | $1,377,878 |
| 59 | Fowler Farms II LLC | Nortonville, KS 66060 | $1,374,831 |
| 60 | Oak Hill Farm Inc | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $1,367,032 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf