Counter Cyclical Program in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,703

Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $5,773,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Counter Cyclical Program
1995-2021
1Ray EnterprisesWinfield, KS 67156$341,542
2Croft Farms IncAnthony, KS 67003$221,231
3Seeliger Farms IncBurden, KS 67019$185,948
4Kendall E RichArkansas City, KS 67005$177,914
5Mike E ThompsonUdall, KS 67146$124,214
6John W PoseyArkansas City, KS 67005$101,113
7Don MortonUdall, KS 67146$95,833
8Thom Land And Cattle Co IncMedicine Lodge, KS 67104$91,838
9Mark D Schrock TrustHazelton, KS 67061$88,872
10Charles C Buss Revocable TrustOxford, KS 67119$84,847
11Clark Wayne Thom - Clark W Thom Living TrustIsabel, KS 67065$82,983
12Charles Wayne Thom Living TrustMedicine Lodge, KS 67104$76,469
13Dusty E AlbrightAnthony, KS 67003$70,427
14Roark Farms LLCKiowa, KS 67070$70,424
15Barnett Bros Farm PartnershipUdall, KS 67146$64,766
16Brothers Dairy IncBurden, KS 67019$59,360
17Steven P SchmidtCaldwell, KS 67022$58,315
18Ralph E And Jacquelyn L Russell Revocable TrustWinfield, KS 67156$45,826
19John T & Myrtle I Posey RevocableArkansas City, KS 67005$45,607
20Smith BrothersGeuda Springs, KS 67051$35,636

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag