Total Conservation Programs in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,902
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $82,770,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gail M Shallcross | Tulsa, OK 74105 | $943,812 |
2 | Herbert F Landwehr | Sharon, KS 67138 | $511,038 |
3 | Schupbach Ranch Inc | Alva, OK 73717 | $439,871 |
4 | Sondra Kay Gibson | South Hutchinson, KS 67505 | $405,822 |
5 | Larry Bob Jones | Anthony, KS 67003 | $365,811 |
6 | Dorothy S Conrady Rev Tr | Wichita, KS 67235 | $358,156 |
7 | Chain Land & Cattle Co | Canton, OK 73724 | $338,397 |
8 | Phillip Patterson | Anthony, KS 67003 | $336,640 |
9 | Darrol W Miller | Coldwater, KS 67029 | $314,271 |
10 | James D Herrington | Coldwater, KS 67029 | $305,654 |
11 | Gerald D Rousseau Dvm | Haysville, KS 67060 | $305,514 |
12 | Rianmar Ranch LLC | Tulsa, OK 74105 | $304,730 |
13 | Curtis Unruh | Canton, KS 67428 | $292,751 |
14 | John R Talbert Trust B | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $290,708 |
15 | David R Parks Dvm | Guthrie, OK 73044 | $288,058 |
16 | Donald Lambert | Sawyer, KS 67134 | $286,605 |
17 | Oscar Blount | Broken Arrow, OK 74013 | $281,877 |
18 | Lohrding 3 Bar Ranch Inc | Coldwater, KS 67029 | $272,789 |
19 | Carroll Dean Gates | Effingham, IL 62401 | $266,709 |
20 | Cordelia O Reynolds | Florence, OR 97439 | $263,852 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>