Total Commodity Programs in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 15,760

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 4th District of Kansas (Rep. Ron Estes) totaled $747,060,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Ray EnterprisesWinfield, KS 67156$4,051,979
2Har El Acres IncConway Springs, KS 67031$1,775,226
3Patterson & Patterson PtrAnthony, KS 67003$1,722,244
4Ternes Farms IncPeck, KS 67120$1,687,466
5Larry C ParkerMulvane, KS 67110$1,621,609
6J & M Ranch IncAnthony, KS 67003$1,619,652
7Metz Farms PartnershipOxford, KS 67119$1,610,628
8M & S Francis Farms IncAnthony, KS 67003$1,568,193
9Francis Farms IncAnthony, KS 67003$1,507,278
10Randy Tracy Revocable TrustArgonia, KS 67004$1,506,037
11Carothers Bros PtrAnthony, KS 67003$1,486,122
12Norman L & Carole L Christenson Living TrustWinfield, KS 67156$1,477,828
13Mcclung BrothersWinfield, KS 67156$1,421,548
14Heimerman FarmsPeck, KS 67120$1,413,129
15Clark Wayne Thom - Clark W Thom Living TrustIsabel, KS 67065$1,409,939
16Tencleve Farms LLCWellington, KS 67152$1,400,073
17Cox Farms IncAnthony, KS 67003$1,389,277
18Campbell Farms LLCWinfield, KS 67156$1,387,731
19John B Forester Living TrustKiowa, KS 67070$1,385,778
20Timothy W IsaacsWellington, KS 67152$1,379,536

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag