Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 1st District of Kenucky (Rep. James Comer), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 781
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 1st District of Kenucky (Rep. James Comer) totaled $36,696,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Whispering Winds Farms | Hopkinsville, KY 42241 | $1,588,545 |
2 | Charles And Ann Garnett Farms | Hopkinsville, KY 42240 | $1,125,426 |
3 | Seven Springs Farms | Cadiz, KY 42211 | $962,745 |
4 | Cook Farms General Partnership | Princeton, KY 42445 | $936,981 |
5 | Cundiff Farms | Cadiz, KY 42211 | $808,874 |
6 | Isom Brothers | Hopkinsville, KY 42240 | $638,986 |
7 | William And Lynn Garnett Farms | Hopkinsville, KY 42240 | $604,749 |
8 | Sisk Farms | Hopkinsville, KY 42240 | $525,208 |
9 | Hunt Farms | Herndon, KY 42236 | $504,449 |
10 | Steve Anderson Farms | Morganfield, KY 42437 | $472,619 |
11 | Philip And Marsha Garnett Farms | Hopkinsville, KY 42240 | $458,536 |
12 | Brame Farms Family Partnership | Hopkinsville, KY 42240 | $441,120 |
13 | Damien Elder & Sons A Partnership | Morganfield, KY 42437 | $379,259 |
14 | Hardesty Farms | Morganfield, KY 42437 | $377,275 |
15 | Sprague Brothers Farms | Morganfield, KY 42437 | $376,699 |
16 | Gilliam Farms | Pembroke, KY 42266 | $376,378 |
17 | Mcelroy Farms Enterprises | Waverly, KY 42462 | $343,919 |
18 | River Bend Farms | Cadiz, KY 42211 | $332,455 |
19 | S & S Farm | Morganfield, KY 42437 | $328,530 |
20 | Furches Farms | Murray, KY 42071 | $312,132 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>