Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 1st District of Kenucky (Rep. James Comer), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 781

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 1st District of Kenucky (Rep. James Comer) totaled $36,696,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2021
1Whispering Winds FarmsHopkinsville, KY 42241$1,588,545
2Charles And Ann Garnett FarmsHopkinsville, KY 42240$1,125,426
3Seven Springs FarmsCadiz, KY 42211$962,745
4Cook Farms General PartnershipPrinceton, KY 42445$936,981
5Cundiff FarmsCadiz, KY 42211$808,874
6Isom BrothersHopkinsville, KY 42240$638,986
7William And Lynn Garnett FarmsHopkinsville, KY 42240$604,749
8Sisk FarmsHopkinsville, KY 42240$525,208
9Hunt FarmsHerndon, KY 42236$504,449
10Steve Anderson FarmsMorganfield, KY 42437$472,619
11Philip And Marsha Garnett FarmsHopkinsville, KY 42240$458,536
12Brame Farms Family PartnershipHopkinsville, KY 42240$441,120
13Damien Elder & Sons A PartnershipMorganfield, KY 42437$379,259
14Hardesty FarmsMorganfield, KY 42437$377,275
15Sprague Brothers FarmsMorganfield, KY 42437$376,699
16Gilliam FarmsPembroke, KY 42266$376,378
17Mcelroy Farms EnterprisesWaverly, KY 42462$343,919
18River Bend FarmsCadiz, KY 42211$332,455
19S & S FarmMorganfield, KY 42437$328,530
20Furches FarmsMurray, KY 42071$312,132

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag