Farm Subsidy information
5th District of Louisiana
(Rep. Ralph Abraham)
Total Subsidies in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,533
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $159,765,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Red Gum Planting Co No 2 | Ferriday, LA 71334 | $790,009 |
22 | Tensas State Bank ** | Tallulah, LA 71284 | $730,508 |
23 | Balmoral Farming Partnership | Newellton, LA 71357 | $655,985 |
24 | Jbf Partnership | Transylvania, LA 71286 | $648,926 |
25 | Capital One Bank ** | Plano, TX 75024 | $646,375 |
26 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $603,925 |
27 | Michael Brown & Sons | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $601,516 |
28 | Perritt Farms Partnership | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $573,763 |
29 | Yates Farms Partnership | Vidalia, LA 71373 | $572,488 |
30 | Stutts Bros Farm Partnership | Bonita, LA 71223 | $555,224 |
31 | Maryland Plantation | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $544,699 |
32 | Clark Farms Joint Venture | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $533,758 |
33 | Staple Cotton Discount Corp | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $530,439 |
34 | Franklin Partnership | Rayville, LA 71269 | $512,954 |
35 | Franklin Farms | Newellton, LA 71357 | $488,200 |
36 | Farm & Livestock Credit LLC ** | Newellton, LA 71357 | $483,697 |
37 | Vandeven Farms | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $475,260 |
38 | Larche Farm Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $474,105 |
39 | Patrick Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $466,784 |
40 | Doodlebug Farms Partnership | Monroe, LA 71202 | $463,736 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”