Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,522

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 5th District of Louisiana (Rep. Ralph Abraham) totaled $117,957,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2021
1Condrey FarmsLake Providence, LA 71254$1,376,055
2Balmoral Farming PartnershipNewellton, LA 71357$868,393
3Red Gum Planting Co No 2Ferriday, LA 71334$867,662
4Delta Bank **Lake Providence, LA 71254$837,244
5Marsh FarmsTallulah, LA 71282$709,534
6Thornton FarmsTransylvania, LA 71286$706,139
7Hard Bargain Farms PartnershipEpps, LA 71237$642,894
8Catahoula-lasalle Bank **Jonesville, LA 71343$614,163
9First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$600,338
10Maryland PlantationSaint Joseph, LA 71366$565,759
11Clark Farms Joint VentureMer Rouge, LA 71261$551,349
12Ken And William Moroni FarmsSicily Island, LA 71368$545,171
13Jbf PartnershipTransylvania, LA 71286$500,762
14Mize FarmsSaint Joseph, LA 71366$493,716
15Islington PlantationTallulah, LA 71282$478,376
16Graham Farms PartnershipWinnsboro, LA 71295$466,207
17Lakeland Planting CompanyFerriday, LA 71334$463,985
18Haring Farms Planting PartnershipWisner, LA 71378$462,685
19John Earl And Heather Carroll FarmsGilbert, LA 71336$449,730
20India Planting PartnershipDelhi, LA 71232$443,407

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag