Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 2nd District of Michigan (Rep. Bill Huizenga), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 2nd District of Michigan (Rep. Bill Huizenga) totaled $41,811 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ramthun Farms LLC | New Era, MI 49446 | $14,486 |
| 2 | Daniel A Hoffman | Montague, MI 49437 | $5,278 |
| 3 | E Paul Schroeder | Montague, MI 49437 | $4,959 |
| 4 | Snider Farms LLC | Hart, MI 49420 | $3,709 |
| 5 | Scott Seaver | Montague, MI 49437 | $3,192 |
| 6 | Richard H Smith | Montague, MI 49437 | $3,170 |
| 7 | Davey Dairy Farm LLC | Montague, MI 49437 | $1,644 |
| 8 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,355 |
| 9 | Powers Dairy Farm LLC | Pentwater, MI 49449 | $1,026 |
| 10 | Country Dairy Inc | New Era, MI 49446 | $816 |
| 11 | Gerald And Rusty Shafer LLC | Hart, MI 49420 | $513 |
| 12 | Golden Stock Farms LLC | Mears, MI 49436 | $276 |
| 13 | Holladay Farms LLC | Hart, MI 49420 | $189 |
| 14 | Matthew Woller | Montague, MI 49437 | $173 |
| 15 | Jack Woller | Montague, MI 49437 | $173 |
| 16 | Oomen Brothers Inc | Hart, MI 49420 | $163 |
| 17 | Woller's Shady Lane Farms LLC | Montague, MI 49437 | $156 |
| 18 | Wm Burmeister Farms Inc | Shelby, MI 49455 | $151 |
| 19 | John W Degen | Montague, MI 49437 | $125 |
| 20 | David Cummins | Pentwater, MI 49449 | $81 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf