Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Minnesota
(Rep. Jim Hagedorn)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,467
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $231,316,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pioneer Bank ** | Saint James, MN 56081 | $1,399,599 |
| 2 | Sanders Farms | Truman, MN 56088 | $1,067,152 |
| 3 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $677,237 |
| 4 | First Farmers & Merchants Bank ** | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $668,458 |
| 5 | Wolle Farms | Saint James, MN 56081 | $596,151 |
| 6 | Oehlke Farms | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $593,866 |
| 7 | Truesdell Family Farm Partnership | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $590,372 |
| 8 | Maday Family Farms | Granada, MN 56039 | $533,203 |
| 9 | Compeer Financial ** | Fulda, MN 56131 | $532,176 |
| 10 | Adams Grain Company | Glenville, MN 56036 | $496,838 |
| 11 | Frontier Family Farms | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $483,643 |
| 12 | Golly Farms | Winnebago, MN 56098 | $451,287 |
| 13 | S & H Farms Partnership | Mankato, MN 56001 | $448,392 |
| 14 | Cory & Layne Ebeling Partnership | Trimont, MN 56176 | $414,226 |
| 15 | Highland Family Farms | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $404,856 |
| 16 | Johnson Farms Of Wells | Wells, MN 56097 | $399,363 |
| 17 | Randy Nelson Farms Inc | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $397,577 |
| 18 | Hugoson Pork Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $393,096 |
| 19 | Downs Family Farms | Mankato, MN 56001 | $387,467 |
| 20 | Douglas D Nimz | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $378,018 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf