Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 995

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $34,548,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2021
1Duncanson GrowersMapleton, MN 56065$528,011
2Manthei BrothersMapleton, MN 56065$343,039
3Lantz Farms GpLake Crystal, MN 56055$322,308
4Pinedale FarmsWaseca, MN 56093$256,474
5Wacholz BrothersNew Richland, MN 56072$241,960
6James A KnutsonHartland, MN 56042$216,466
7Stone Lake Farm IncTrimont, MN 56176$209,052
8Molitor Bros FarmCannon Falls, MN 55009$208,717
9Roe Farms PtrLe Roy, MN 55951$192,751
10Michael R WardJanesville, MN 56048$190,837
11Blane Lloyd AmundsonMinnesota Lake, MN 56068$173,843
12Kerry Ann AmundsonMinnesota Lake, MN 56068$173,843
13Bradley David LelandBricelyn, MN 56014$166,925
14Theodore C GoettlLake Crystal, MN 56055$166,279
15Scott Brian HildebrandtWaseca, MN 56093$165,008
16Mrj Farms Of Waltham IncWaltham, MN 55982$163,583
17Finseth Family FarmsFountain, MN 55935$157,972
18Denny Trio Farms IncMapleton, MN 56065$157,007
19Daly Enterprises LLCMinnesota Lake, MN 56068$155,072
20Dobbins Farms LLCRose Creek, MN 55970$148,972

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag