Counter Cyclical Program in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 7,915
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 1st District of Minnesota (Rep. Jim Hagedorn) totaled $110,144,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | M & L Farms | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $99,026 |
22 | Jax Dairy Farms Inc | Adams, MN 55909 | $97,943 |
23 | David Mensink | Preston, MN 55965 | $97,303 |
24 | Hanson Farms | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $97,165 |
25 | Cindy S Vavra | Eden Prairie, MN 55346 | $95,795 |
26 | Ufer Farms Partnership | Truman, MN 56088 | $95,464 |
27 | Jeffrey D Scholl | Trimont, MN 56176 | $93,506 |
28 | Pinedale Farms | Waseca, MN 56093 | $92,292 |
29 | Michael Keith Fields | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $92,013 |
30 | Jonathan D Mutschler | Bricelyn, MN 56014 | $91,676 |
31 | Jones Farms | Lake Crystal, MN 56055 | $91,348 |
32 | Ev & Jean Wessels Farms | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $91,066 |
33 | Esb Farm Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $89,402 |
34 | Wangen Brothers Farms %ken Wangen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $89,382 |
35 | Lily Creek Farm Inc | Welcome, MN 56181 | $89,093 |
36 | J-ace Farms Inc | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $88,986 |
37 | Brian Redig | Wells, MN 56097 | $88,932 |
38 | Brandts Hog Farms Inc | Garden City, MN 56034 | $88,343 |
39 | James Hopman | Madelia, MN 56062 | $86,570 |
40 | Roberts Farms Inc | Madelia, MN 56062 | $86,065 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”