Conservation Reserve Program in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 30,738

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $1,469,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2021
21Reuben LindLake Bronson, MN 56734$952,433
22Willis A JohnsonMesa, AZ 85215$952,243
23Lynn Allen HammerThief River Falls, MN 56701$950,774
24Rodahl Farms IncThief River Falls, MN 56701$946,657
25Bernard PiotterHolloway, MN 56249$933,040
26A & P BusinessMiddle River, MN 56737$932,666
27Horst G Lesser TrustGrand Rapids, MI 49515$926,108
28Agcountry Farm Credit Services **Jamestown, ND 58402$919,603
29Arnold P MaurstadArgyle, MN 56713$909,248
30John A CronquistGilby, ND 58235$901,483
31Gregory T DyrdalThief River Falls, MN 56701$894,546
32Raymond KvalvogMoorhead, MN 56560$891,370
33Ron Lesser LLCBloomington, IL 61704$888,832
34Donna M Nelson-arnesonThief River Falls, MN 56701$887,886
35Hillyer Farms IncThief River Falls, MN 56701$885,153
36Clinton E BauerThief River Falls, MN 56701$882,020
37United Grain & Livestock IncThief River Falls, MN 56701$876,630
38Jerroll PetersonLancaster, MN 56735$869,552
39David IrlbeckGrygla, MN 56727$867,749
40Lyndon & Owen Westerberg Partners Westerberg FarmsLake Bronson, MN 56734$859,881

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag