Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Missouri
(Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Missouri (Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,477
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Missouri (Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer) totaled $85,064,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Heck Brothers Inc | Hermann, MO 65041 | $451,533 |
| 22 | Deeken Farms | Linn, MO 65051 | $451,465 |
| 23 | Niemeyer Farm Inc | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $442,082 |
| 24 | James R Hurst | Meta, MO 65058 | $424,606 |
| 25 | Alfred James Brandt | Linn, MO 65051 | $401,565 |
| 26 | Tuque Prairie Farms Inc | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $399,391 |
| 27 | Glen Alan Henneke | Linn, MO 65051 | $391,190 |
| 28 | Paul F Gausmann Revocable Living | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $389,449 |
| 29 | Schneider Farms Inc | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $380,230 |
| 30 | Allan Wehrman | Wright City, MO 63390 | $378,333 |
| 31 | Dwayne Loehnig | Hermann, MO 65041 | $360,830 |
| 32 | R Ley Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $353,054 |
| 33 | Wayne Diermann | Dutzow, MO 63342 | $352,717 |
| 34 | James Hellebusch | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $342,656 |
| 35 | Leonard Keilholz | Chamois, MO 65024 | $341,277 |
| 36 | Francis Liermann Trust | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $336,560 |
| 37 | Jeremy Hecktor | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $334,630 |
| 38 | Verlyn Schulze | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $325,296 |
| 39 | Albert H Jacob | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $323,512 |
| 40 | Russell Vahle - Russell & Janet Vahle Living Trust | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $317,352 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf