Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 3rd District of Missouri (Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 93

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 3rd District of Missouri (Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer) totaled $1,067,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2021
1Paulsmeyer Farms IncChamois, MO 65024$111,981
2David Edward TroesserBonnots Mill, MO 65016$69,627
3Glen Alan HennekeLinn, MO 65051$48,309
4Keith E NeierLinn, MO 65051$47,809
5Carl David TroesserBonnots Mill, MO 65016$39,059
6Gloe Farms IncHermann, MO 65041$35,273
7Terry A Joerling Rev Liv TrustAugusta, MO 63332$34,757
8Verlyn SchulzeWarrenton, MO 63383$30,382
9Kent Albert KuschelChamois, MO 65024$28,938
10Karl Reuben KuschelChamois, MO 65024$28,938
11Russell Vahle - Russell & Janet Vahle Living TrustWarrenton, MO 63383$28,696
12Dwayne LoehnigHermann, MO 65041$28,055
13Ralph Hugo BrandtLinn, MO 65051$27,596
14Leo J BrandtBonnots Mill, MO 65016$26,150
15John Raymond BackesBonnots Mill, MO 65016$21,142
16Larry R WinkelmanFreeburg, MO 65035$20,730
17Stephen C WinkelmanFreeburg, MO 65035$20,730
18Wilbert J MuenksBonnots Mill, MO 65016$20,448
19Vahle Farms IncWarrenton, MO 63383$18,800
20Der-val Farms IncFreeburg, MO 65035$16,841

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag