Counter Cyclical Program in 6th District of Missouri (Rep. Sam Graves), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 18,955
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 6th District of Missouri (Rep. Sam Graves) totaled $73,580,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dale Farming Company | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $430,856 |
2 | Meinke Farms | Princeton, MO 64673 | $179,656 |
3 | Wayne Johnson Farms | Spickard, MO 64679 | $108,288 |
4 | Jerry Brown Inc | Skidmore, MO 64487 | $101,784 |
5 | Charles B Keller III | Taylor, MO 63471 | $96,106 |
6 | Atha Farms Gen Ptnshp | Saint Joseph, MO 64507 | $95,870 |
7 | Garland Shipps Family Limited Par | Maryville, MO 64468 | $95,486 |
8 | Klr Inc | Mound City, MO 64470 | $95,190 |
9 | Buschling Farms | Canton, MO 63435 | $90,157 |
10 | Corbin Farms | Mound City, MO 64470 | $86,100 |
11 | Duane Frieden Inc | Taylor, MO 63471 | $82,337 |
12 | Potter Farms Inc | Bolckow, MO 64427 | $79,663 |
13 | Brent Boyd | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $78,419 |
14 | Griffin Farms | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $75,847 |
15 | Phil Sommer | Oregon, MO 64473 | $75,529 |
16 | R & M Farms, Inc. | Lewistown, MO 63452 | $75,151 |
17 | Randy Klocke | Ewing, MO 63440 | $74,788 |
18 | Payton Farms Inc | Platte City, MO 64079 | $74,243 |
19 | Harold L Logsdon | Canton, MO 63435 | $73,805 |
20 | Doug Mccrea Farms Inc | King City, MO 64463 | $73,485 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>