Conservation Reserve Program in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,730

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $116,087,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1Bock Bros TimberCharleston, MO 63834$1,268,340
2Keith HancockPuxico, MO 63960$938,411
3Kohlfeld Farm TrustCape Girardeau, MO 63702$647,849
4Carl & Fern Rehm FarmsAdvance, MO 63730$574,397
5Elakco FarmsPortageville, MO 63873$518,603
6Friedrich Farms IncJackson, MO 63755$506,165
7Kevin StubenrauchBell City, MO 63735$495,067
8Thomas Franklin DawsonBernie, MO 63822$489,446
9Lewis Riley TrustLilbourn, MO 63862$488,227
10Arthur - Arthur Smit B SmithFriedheim, MO 63747$484,081
11Richard A Martin Md Rev Tr - Richard A Martin MdCape Girardeau, MO 63701$463,214
12Kirby R & Deborah S Grantham Joint Rev TrustOak Ridge, MO 63769$446,118
13Leo Loehnig- Leo W Loehnig Revocable Living TrustSaint Louis, MO 63128$445,449
14G Wendell WeathersSikeston, MO 63801$438,669
15Edward EubanksDexter, MO 63841$425,205
16Jerry - Jerry & Darl PetzoldtJackson, MO 63755$410,675
17Richard Ellsworth HancockFisk, MO 63940$406,683
18Robert E Dean Living TrustPerryville, MO 63775$397,881
19Moore TrustSikeston, MO 63801$392,316
20Heartland Potato FarmBenton, MO 63736$388,743

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>


Farm Subsidies Education