Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,688

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 1st District of Mississippi (Rep. Trent Kelly) totaled $26,574,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2021
1Mcfarling Farms PartnershipTupelo, MS 38801$462,996
2Carnathan Brothers Farms PtnrOkolona, MS 38860$437,039
3Aesland FarmsPrairie, MS 39756$381,757
4H H FarmsTupelo, MS 38804$364,563
5Jamerson Farms IIRossville, TN 38066$361,269
6Sand Creek Farms IncTupelo, MS 38804$270,367
7Mitchell FarmsRienzi, MS 38865$248,892
8Mccord Farms, LLCTupelo, MS 38804$240,089
9Eaton FarmsRienzi, MS 38865$237,545
10Tucker Farming CoHamilton, MS 39746$217,398
11Sadie Ridge Farms IncSaltillo, MS 38866$216,686
12Tony R KellyWhiteville, TN 38075$206,758
13Gary And Mack MitchellCorinth, MS 38834$205,212
14Mud Creek Farms IncBlue Springs, MS 38828$199,119
15Hendrix Company PartnersHolly Springs, MS 38634$198,110
16Moore Farms Brandon & CathyRienzi, MS 38865$183,456
17First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$181,394
18Jerry CoxRienzi, MS 38865$174,556
19Buster Brown Farms IncSaltillo, MS 38866$164,517
20Herman E Hussey SrTupelo, MS 38804$159,229

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag