Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Mississippi
(Rep. Bennie Thompson)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 19,413
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $5,496,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Planters Bank & Trust Company ** | Indianola, MS 38751 | $22,361,893 |
| 2 | Bruton Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $21,671,446 |
| 3 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $21,392,073 |
| 4 | New Hope Farms | Schlater, MS 38952 | $20,575,381 |
| 5 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $20,281,016 |
| 6 | Dixie Farms | Vance, MS 38964 | $18,432,871 |
| 7 | Maxwell Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $17,936,387 |
| 8 | Guaranty Bank & Trust Co ** | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $17,505,392 |
| 9 | Seward & Son Planting Company | Louise, MS 39097 | $17,402,258 |
| 10 | Steele Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $17,382,161 |
| 11 | Phillips Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $17,143,144 |
| 12 | The Jefferson Bank ** | Greenville, MS 38704 | $16,534,649 |
| 13 | St Rest Planting Co | Indianola, MS 38751 | $16,382,833 |
| 14 | Due West | Glendora, MS 38928 | $16,376,050 |
| 15 | Holly Ridge Planting Co | Indianola, MS 38751 | $15,776,711 |
| 16 | Gypsy Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $14,780,165 |
| 17 | Pitts Farms | Indianola, MS 38751 | $14,680,429 |
| 18 | Bank Of Anguilla ** | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $14,083,278 |
| 19 | First National Bank Of Clarksdale ** | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $14,063,205 |
| 20 | Satterfield Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $13,977,301 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf