Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,290

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $550,085,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
1995-2021
1Planters Bank & Trust Company **Indianola, MS 38751$20,864,155
2First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$19,476,679
3First National Bank Of Clarksdale **Clarksdale, MS 38614$13,896,053
4Guaranty Bank & Trust Co **Belzoni, MS 39038$11,805,104
5Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$9,898,731
6The Jefferson Bank **Greenville, MS 38704$9,381,144
7Bank Of Commerce **Greenwood, MS 38935$8,322,719
8Bank Of Anguilla **Anguilla, MS 38721$8,310,640
9Regions Bank **Grenada, MS 38901$6,763,884
10State Bank & Trust Company **Greenwood, MS 38935$6,141,774
11Bankplus **Yazoo City, MS 39194$6,017,881
12Southern Agricultural Credit Corp **Rolling Fork, MS 39159$5,283,412
13First Security Bank **Batesville, MS 38606$5,018,231
14Citizens Bank & Trust Co **Marks, MS 38646$4,947,296
15Steele FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$3,754,333
16Southern Bancorp Bank **Trumann, AR 72472$3,751,202
17Seward & Son Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$3,696,032
18Staple Cotton Discount CorpGreenwood, MS 38935$3,193,607
19Circle H Joint VentureCleveland, MS 38732$3,069,541
20Satterfield FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$2,984,952

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag