Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 13,882

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $4,864,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Planters Bank & Trust Company **Indianola, MS 38751$22,320,104
2Bruton Farms PartnershipHollandale, MS 38748$21,490,784
3Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$21,392,073
4New Hope FarmsSchlater, MS 38952$20,413,598
5First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$20,281,016
6Dixie FarmsVance, MS 38964$18,313,852
7Maxwell FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$17,866,555
8Guaranty Bank & Trust Co **Belzoni, MS 39038$17,485,392
9Seward & Son Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$16,975,487
10The Jefferson Bank **Greenville, MS 38704$16,534,649
11Steele FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$16,306,294
12St Rest Planting CoIndianola, MS 38751$16,268,624
13Due WestGlendora, MS 38928$16,234,938
14Holly Ridge Planting CoIndianola, MS 38751$15,466,967
15Pitts FarmsIndianola, MS 38751$14,621,391
16Phillips FarmsHolly Bluff, MS 39088$14,402,209
17Gypsy FarmsGreenville, MS 38703$14,220,542
18Bank Of Anguilla **Anguilla, MS 38721$14,083,278
19First National Bank Of Clarksdale **Clarksdale, MS 38614$14,063,205
20Satterfield FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$13,791,860

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag