Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 2019

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,286

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $323,228,000 in in 2019.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
2019
1Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$11,922,915
2The Jefferson Bank **Greenville, MS 38704$8,640,620
3Planters Bank & Trust Company **Indianola, MS 38751$7,786,530
4Guaranty Bank & Trust Co **Belzoni, MS 39038$7,167,073
5First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$6,631,693
6Bank Of Anguilla **Anguilla, MS 38721$6,133,571
7Southern Agricultural Credit Corp **Rolling Fork, MS 39159$5,217,995
8First National Bank Of Clarksdale **Clarksdale, MS 38614$4,396,385
9Staple Cotton Discount CorpGreenwood, MS 38935$4,046,914
10Citizens Bank & Trust Co **Marks, MS 38646$3,384,290
11Regions Bank **Grenada, MS 38901$3,073,195
12Bank Of Commerce **Greenwood, MS 38935$2,679,929
13State Bank & Trust Company **Greenwood, MS 38935$2,366,419
14First Security Bank **Batesville, MS 38606$1,883,181
15Southern Bancorp Bank **Trumann, AR 72472$1,764,271
16Seward & Son Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$1,726,686
17Morgan Planting Co PartnershipShaw, MS 38773$1,613,071
18Holly Ridge Planting CoIndianola, MS 38751$1,578,831
19Steele FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$1,475,030
20White Farms AjvMarks, MS 38646$1,457,014

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag