Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,879
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $124,599,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Planters Bank & Trust Company ** | Indianola, MS 38751 | $4,911,865 |
| 2 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $4,329,173 |
| 3 | First National Bank Of Clarksdale ** | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $3,575,699 |
| 4 | Guaranty Bank & Trust Co ** | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $3,542,499 |
| 5 | Bank Of Anguilla ** | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $2,320,437 |
| 6 | Bank Of Commerce ** | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $2,246,357 |
| 7 | The Jefferson Bank ** | Greenville, MS 38704 | $1,976,135 |
| 8 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $1,969,948 |
| 9 | Regions Bank ** | Grenada, MS 38901 | $1,668,835 |
| 10 | State Bank & Trust Company ** | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $1,438,817 |
| 11 | Bankplus ** | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,306,408 |
| 12 | First Security Bank ** | Batesville, MS 38606 | $1,216,323 |
| 13 | Southern Agricultural Credit Corp ** | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $1,196,216 |
| 14 | Citizens Bank & Trust Co ** | Marks, MS 38646 | $1,037,883 |
| 15 | Staple Cotton Discount Corp | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $980,744 |
| 16 | Seward & Son Planting Company | Louise, MS 39097 | $886,079 |
| 17 | Southern Bancorp Bank ** | Trumann, AR 72472 | $735,987 |
| 18 | Simplot Ab Retail Sub, Inc. | Tunica, MS 38676 | $602,426 |
| 19 | Steele Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $579,659 |
| 20 | New Hope Farms | Schlater, MS 38952 | $532,677 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf