Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Mississippi
(Rep. Steven Palazzo)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Mississippi (Rep. Steven Palazzo), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 175
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Mississippi (Rep. Steven Palazzo) totaled $4,161,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pierce Farms | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $615,801 |
2 | Seward Farms | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $613,877 |
3 | Red Oaks Farm | Richton, MS 39476 | $563,763 |
4 | Massey Produce Farm LLC | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $302,092 |
5 | Kendall Stringfellow | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $293,939 |
6 | Harley E Havard & Marion S Tanner | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $259,027 |
7 | Driskell Cotton Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $181,618 |
8 | Thomas A Smith | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $130,883 |
9 | Clayton Lawrence Jr | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $116,634 |
10 | Parden Farms Inc | Perkinston, MS 39573 | $108,343 |
11 | Nutrien Ag Solutions | Spanish Fort, AL 36527 | $97,276 |
12 | Big Creek Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $94,463 |
13 | Chip Moran Jr | Kiln, MS 39556 | $71,870 |
14 | T & M Farms | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $40,184 |
15 | Chasten L Courtney | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $37,910 |
16 | Hugh L Pierce | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $32,958 |
17 | Smith's Honey Farm LLC | Petal, MS 39465 | $32,206 |
18 | G & W Farm LLC | Slidell, LA 70461 | $31,340 |
19 | Timothy Lee Sanford | Collins, MS 39428 | $30,631 |
20 | Davey Edley Casey | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $29,829 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>