Farm Subsidy information
1st District of North Carolina
(Rep. G.K. Butterfield)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,447
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $143,232,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $5,516,185 |
| 2 | Battleboro Ag Partnership | Battleboro, NC 27809 | $2,262,724 |
| 3 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $1,927,722 |
| 4 | Anderson Farms | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $1,753,806 |
| 5 | Farless & Sons | Merry Hill, NC 27957 | $1,147,755 |
| 6 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $934,810 |
| 7 | Evans Farms | Nashville, NC 27856 | $868,647 |
| 8 | Agcarolina Farm Credit ** | Elizabeth City, NC 27906 | $851,791 |
| 9 | Rest-a-bit Farms | Pinetops, NC 27864 | $807,127 |
| 10 | Miller Partnership | Gatesville, NC 27938 | $801,931 |
| 11 | Scott Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $800,559 |
| 12 | Keel Brothers Farms | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $782,455 |
| 13 | Tnt Family Farms Inc | Spring Hope, NC 27882 | $762,746 |
| 14 | Harrell And Owens Farm | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $755,535 |
| 15 | Nash Pigg Rentals LLC | Bailey, NC 27807 | $707,701 |
| 16 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $700,954 |
| 17 | R B Lancaster & Sons Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $690,764 |
| 18 | Kent Smith Farms | Rocky Mount, NC 27803 | $690,336 |
| 19 | Amd Farms | Hobgood, NC 27843 | $688,103 |
| 20 | Sharp Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $662,655 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf