Farm Subsidy information
1st District of North Carolina
(Rep. G.K. Butterfield)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 29,791
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $1,742,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Josey Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $4,943,041 |
22 | Urquhart Farms Inc | Lewiston Woodville, NC 27849 | $4,879,822 |
23 | Rock Ridge Farm Partnership | Wilson, NC 27893 | $4,855,799 |
24 | Scott Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $4,849,528 |
25 | Bennett Bros Ptn | Rich Square, NC 27869 | $4,833,981 |
26 | Jrk Farms LLC | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $4,825,271 |
27 | W & S Farms | Windsor, NC 27983 | $4,763,038 |
28 | Evans Brothers Partnership | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $4,672,564 |
29 | Beasley Partnership | Colerain, NC 27924 | $4,585,973 |
30 | Brinkley Farms Inc | Aulander, NC 27805 | $4,548,951 |
31 | Morell Jones Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $4,447,249 |
32 | Byrum Farm Service Center Inc | Ahoskie, NC 27910 | $4,354,644 |
33 | Fisher Farms Partnership | Whitakers, NC 27891 | $4,185,374 |
34 | Latros Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $4,158,414 |
35 | H & H Farms | Como, NC 27818 | $4,150,275 |
36 | Marion L Pridgen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27894 | $4,104,965 |
37 | Griffin Farming Partnership | Lewiston, NC 27849 | $4,024,795 |
38 | Tommy Castelow | Cofield, NC 27922 | $3,986,204 |
39 | Rest-a-bit Farms | Pinetops, NC 27864 | $3,959,083 |
40 | Battleboro Ag Partnership | Battleboro, NC 27809 | $3,924,479 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”