Direct Payment Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,810

Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $225,337,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Direct Payment Program
1995-2021
21Keel Brothers FarmsRobersonville, NC 27871$829,982
22Rest-a-bit FarmsPinetops, NC 27864$823,733
23Danijoe FarmsRich Square, NC 27869$808,773
24Rock Ridge Farm PartnershipWilson, NC 27893$807,126
25H & H FarmsComo, NC 27818$805,430
26Miller PartnershipGatesville, NC 27938$784,892
27Stuart Pierce Farms IncAhoskie, NC 27910$779,124
28Spruill FarmsRoper, NC 27970$756,797
29Rose Farm Joint VentureNashville, NC 27856$746,026
30Fisher Farms PartnershipWhitakers, NC 27891$731,225
31Mush Island FarmsRoanoke Rapids, NC 27870$730,528
32Brinkley Farms IncAulander, NC 27805$727,464
33Vick Family Farms PartnershipWilson, NC 27896$710,971
34Morell Jones FarmsEnfield, NC 27823$705,602
35Byrum Farm Service Center IncAhoskie, NC 27910$696,565
36W & N PartnershipColerain, NC 27924$689,251
37Harden Farms IncWindsor, NC 27983$676,309
38Urquhart Farms IncLewiston Woodville, NC 27849$675,435
39John R Grimes Jr FarmsBattleboro, NC 27809$674,749
40Thomas E Allen & Sons LLCPantego, NC 27860$659,330

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag