Marketing Loan Gains in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2020‡
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,004
Recipients of Marketing Loan Gains from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $19,527,000 in from 1995-2020‡.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Marketing Loan Gains 1995-2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dunlow And Dunlow * | Gaston, NC 27832 | $465,624 |
| 2 | Morell Jones Farms * | Enfield, NC 27823 | $285,281 |
| 3 | Flythe Farms * | Seaboard, NC 27876 | $262,789 |
| 4 | Mcgee Farms * | Severn, NC 27877 | $255,155 |
| 5 | Brinkley Farms Inc * | Aulander, NC 27805 | $254,813 |
| 6 | Umphlett Brothers * | Gates, NC 27937 | $252,781 |
| 7 | Battleboro Ag Partnership * | Battleboro, NC 27809 | $218,404 |
| 8 | Urquhart Farms Inc * | Lewiston Woodville, NC 27849 | $217,455 |
| 9 | Tim Phelps Farms LLC * | Gaston, NC 27832 | $213,068 |
| 10 | Griffin Farming Partnership * | Lewiston, NC 27849 | $209,010 |
| 11 | B & D Lassiter Farms * | Conway, NC 27820 | $203,614 |
| 12 | Pike Family Farms Partnership * | Littleton, NC 27850 | $201,198 |
| 13 | Stephenson Bros * | Garysburg, NC 27831 | $190,303 |
| 14 | W & S Farms * | Windsor, NC 27983 | $186,646 |
| 15 | H & H Farms * | Como, NC 27818 | $183,864 |
| 16 | Indian Neck Farm Inc * | Hobbsville, NC 27946 | $181,809 |
| 17 | Miller Partnership * | Gatesville, NC 27938 | $180,485 |
| 18 | Stuart Pierce Farms Inc * | Ahoskie, NC 27910 | $178,803 |
| 19 | Beasley Partnership * | Colerain, NC 27924 | $174,184 |
| 20 | Harris Farms Inc * | Roper, NC 27970 | $169,687 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf