Farm Subsidy information
9th District of North Carolina
(Open Seat)
Total Subsidies in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,090
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $12,304,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Randy Lee Kiker Jr | Monroe, NC 28112 | $294,489 |
| 2 | Mr Jesse Chaying Yang | Maxton, NC 28364 | $250,000 |
| 3 | Carmichael Farms LLC | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $221,005 |
| 4 | Mcdonald Brothers | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $208,782 |
| 5 | Walton Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $204,143 |
| 6 | Nick Evans Farms | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $190,657 |
| 7 | Roger Dean Oxendine | Rowland, NC 28383 | $181,054 |
| 8 | Buie Family Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $173,592 |
| 9 | Hendrix Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $155,449 |
| 10 | Nc Dept Of Agriculture & Consumer Services | Raleigh, NC 27699 | $150,000 |
| 11 | Forbis Farms Inc | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $148,575 |
| 12 | Bobby K Davis | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $138,630 |
| 13 | Hagler Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $138,345 |
| 14 | Gibson Farms Of Hoke Co Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $137,730 |
| 15 | White Rock Farms LLC | Marshville, NC 28103 | $135,152 |
| 16 | Lacy Ledford Cummings | Pembroke, NC 28372 | $134,955 |
| 17 | Smith & Barkley Farms Inc | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $134,280 |
| 18 | Philip Futrell | Wagram, NC 28396 | $134,114 |
| 19 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $133,084 |
| 20 | Mike Miller Farms LLC | Rowland, NC 28383 | $128,899 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf