Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 521
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $14,088,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Walton Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $396,244 |
2 | Forbis Farms Inc | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $291,758 |
3 | Hendrix Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $290,346 |
4 | Mcdonald Brothers | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $277,682 |
5 | Carmichael Farms LLC | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $260,655 |
6 | Smith & Barkley Farms Inc | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $254,989 |
7 | T G Gibson Farms | Gibson, NC 28343 | $251,233 |
8 | Philip Futrell | Wagram, NC 28396 | $244,050 |
9 | Jack Leggette Farms | Rowland, NC 28383 | $240,142 |
10 | Bobby K Davis | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $237,877 |
11 | Nick Evans Farms | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $233,954 |
12 | Roger Dean Oxendine | Rowland, NC 28383 | $218,738 |
13 | Buie Family Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $207,921 |
14 | Billy Franklin Lee | Norwood, NC 28128 | $203,946 |
15 | Edens Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $190,609 |
16 | Mitch & Garrison Farms Inc | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $176,746 |
17 | Gibson Farms Of Hoke Co Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $175,155 |
18 | Mike Miller Farms LLC | Rowland, NC 28383 | $168,927 |
19 | P & S Farms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $166,079 |
20 | Lacy Ledford Cummings | Pembroke, NC 28372 | $163,060 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>