Production Flexibility Program in 10th District of North Carolina (Rep. Patrick McHenry), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,165
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 10th District of North Carolina (Rep. Patrick McHenry) totaled $5,124,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | G K & Ken Davis Inc | Crouse, NC 28033 | $37,155 |
22 | Jeff Doub | East Bend, NC 27018 | $35,095 |
23 | Darrell R Doub | East Bend, NC 27018 | $35,089 |
24 | Larry Doub | East Bend, NC 27018 | $31,820 |
25 | Derrick Hobson | Boonville, NC 27011 | $31,484 |
26 | Kenneth W Williams | East Bend, NC 27018 | $31,364 |
27 | Bobby S Adams | Elkin, NC 28621 | $31,159 |
28 | Alex Shugart | Yadkinville, NC 27055 | $30,975 |
29 | Kent Doub | East Bend, NC 27018 | $30,890 |
30 | Michael Payne | Elkin, NC 28621 | $30,113 |
31 | Riverview Farm | Boonville, NC 27011 | $29,502 |
32 | Jerry Wyant | Vale, NC 28168 | $29,333 |
33 | Tommy D Houser | Vale, NC 28168 | $28,991 |
34 | Brawley Brothers Dairy | Yadkinville, NC 27055 | $28,944 |
35 | Pendry Dairy Farm | Boonville, NC 27011 | $28,326 |
36 | Bess Farms Inc | Lincolnton, NC 28092 | $27,702 |
37 | Carl Matthews | East Bend, NC 27018 | $27,121 |
38 | Maple Ridge Farms | Mount Airy, NC 27030 | $26,596 |
39 | Davis Brothers | Dobson, NC 27017 | $26,368 |
40 | Eddie Johnson | Elkin, NC 28621 | $25,803 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”