Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,199
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry) totaled $6,271,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Riddell Sales Inc | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $50,000 |
2 | Ruth M Preston | Rosalie, NE 68055 | $50,000 |
3 | Ronald L Carson Sr | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $50,000 |
4 | Allan M Preston | Rosalie, NE 68055 | $50,000 |
5 | Rolling Hills Investment Group LLC | Beemer, NE 68716 | $49,957 |
6 | Shirley A Scholz | Crete, NE 68333 | $49,512 |
7 | John Klement | Ulysses, NE 68669 | $48,209 |
8 | Thomas Gabel | Homer, NE 68030 | $47,927 |
9 | Rjkc Farms Inc | Rogers, NE 68659 | $47,546 |
10 | Lary D Moeller | Wisner, NE 68791 | $46,101 |
11 | M Scott Doht | Lyons, NE 68038 | $45,945 |
12 | Edith Gay White | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $44,907 |
13 | Herbert Henjes | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $44,499 |
14 | Donnelly Farms Inc | Decatur, NE 68020 | $43,450 |
15 | V-ten LLC | Dallas, TX 75230 | $43,262 |
16 | Perkins Irrevocable Land Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57105 | $42,428 |
17 | Robert A Herling | Schuyler, NE 68661 | $41,738 |
18 | Mary Faith Hansen | Lake Zurich, IL 60047 | $41,544 |
19 | Theodore Richard Eriksen | Tekamah, NE 68061 | $39,584 |
20 | Omaha Tribe Of Nebraska | Macy, NE 68039 | $37,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>