Total Subsidies in 2nd District of New Hampshire (Rep. Ann Kuster), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 609

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of New Hampshire (Rep. Ann Kuster) totaled $24,022,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Putnam Farms IncCharlestown, NH 03603$1,756,617
2Forbes Family Partnership Dba Forbes Farm PartnersLancaster, NH 03584$1,487,240
3Forbes Farm PartnershipLancaster, NH 03584$1,286,060
4Chickering Farm IncWestmoreland, NH 03467$1,047,672
5Windyhurst Farm PartnershipWestmoreland, NH 03467$814,498
6Charles White & SonsColebrook, NH 03576$706,168
7Edward MacglaflinClaremont, NH 03743$672,419
8Flint Farm - Rick & Karen FlintMilan, NH 03588$580,832
9Macglaflin Farm LLCClaremont, NH 03743$515,285
10Mac's Happy AcresPlainfield, NH 03781$500,602
11Leclair AcresClaremont, NH 03743$448,179
12Leclair Acres Farm LLCClaremont, NH 03743$369,029
13Kelly BrothersWinchester, NH 03470$365,670
14Gray Mist FarmGroveton, NH 03582$339,343
15Tobac Inc Dba Boggy Meadow FarmWalpole, NH 03608$310,433
16Alyson's Apple Orchard IncWalpole, NH 03608$289,316
17Eccardt Farm IncWashington, NH 03280$289,128
18Cadillac Farms, LLCAlstead, NH 03602$280,967
19T R Dillon Logging IncAnson, ME 04911$270,698
20Vincent MalnatiWalpole, NH 03608$269,187

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag