Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of New Hampshire (Rep. Ann Kuster), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 408

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of New Hampshire (Rep. Ann Kuster) totaled $20,218,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Putnam Farms IncCharlestown, NH 03603$1,738,351
2Forbes Family Partnership Dba Forbes Farm PartnersLancaster, NH 03584$1,281,111
3Forbes Farm PartnershipLancaster, NH 03584$1,033,721
4Chickering Farm IncWestmoreland, NH 03467$1,019,277
5Windyhurst Farm PartnershipWestmoreland, NH 03467$751,490
6Charles White & SonsColebrook, NH 03576$639,318
7Edward MacglaflinClaremont, NH 03743$570,169
8Macglaflin Farm LLCClaremont, NH 03743$515,285
9Mac's Happy AcresPlainfield, NH 03781$479,092
10Leclair AcresClaremont, NH 03743$441,591
11Flint Farm - Rick & Karen FlintMilan, NH 03588$394,392
12Leclair Acres Farm LLCClaremont, NH 03743$369,029
13Tobac Inc Dba Boggy Meadow FarmWalpole, NH 03608$288,890
14Cadillac Farms, LLCAlstead, NH 03602$280,967
15Eccardt Farm IncWashington, NH 03280$279,445
16T R Dillon Logging IncAnson, ME 04911$270,698
17Vincent MalnatiWalpole, NH 03608$265,578
18Stoneholm Farm LLCPutney, VT 05346$227,850
19Kelly BrothersWinchester, NH 03470$225,264
20A B Logging IncLancaster, NH 03584$214,540

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag