Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of New Mexico
(Rep. Xochitl Torres Small)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,440
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $32,795,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gary & Karen Jackson Farms | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $1,067,007 |
| 2 | Bogle Ltd Co | Dexter, NM 88230 | $439,408 |
| 3 | Goff Dairy, LLC | Hobbs, NM 88240 | $311,091 |
| 4 | Walterscheid Trucking & Farms Inc | Carlsbad, NM 88220 | $308,557 |
| 5 | Las Uvas Valley Dairy | Hatch, NM 87937 | $287,856 |
| 6 | Southwind Dairy LLC | Hagerman, NM 88232 | $275,404 |
| 7 | Lowe Minerals And Land Family Partnership, Ltd | Lubbock, TX 79401 | $260,751 |
| 8 | Dominguez Farms Inc | Mesquite, NM 88048 | $258,802 |
| 9 | Lone Star State Bank Of West Texa ** | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $254,440 |
| 10 | Mescalero Apache Tribe | Mescalero, NM 88340 | $250,989 |
| 11 | Dan-dee Dairy LLC | Dexter, NM 88230 | $235,435 |
| 12 | La Cienega Farms LLC | Hachita, NM 88040 | $233,532 |
| 13 | Ludwig Farms | Anthony, NM 88021 | $212,180 |
| 14 | First United Bank ** | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $211,890 |
| 15 | Wild West Farms | Roswell, NM 88203 | $207,904 |
| 16 | Desertland Dairy LLC | Mesquite, NM 88048 | $201,881 |
| 17 | Cheyenne Dairy | Dexter, NM 88230 | $201,212 |
| 18 | Rockhill Dairy LLC | Dexter, NM 88230 | $195,124 |
| 19 | Three Amigos Dairy | Dexter, NM 88230 | $191,408 |
| 20 | Nathan Lowe | Lubbock, TX 79401 | $185,804 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf