Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,957
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $399,143,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ross Hilburn Farms | Denver City, TX 79323 | $4,839,238 |
| 2 | Dominguez Farms Inc | Mesquite, NM 88048 | $3,677,843 |
| 3 | Gary & Karen Jackson Farms | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $3,177,237 |
| 4 | M & G Joint Venture | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $3,054,131 |
| 5 | High Lonesome Dairy | Clovis, NM 88101 | $2,778,357 |
| 6 | Bogle Ltd Co | Dexter, NM 88230 | $2,769,931 |
| 7 | Rancho La Frontera | Columbus, NM 88029 | $2,486,204 |
| 8 | Las Uvas Valley Dairy | Hatch, NM 87937 | $2,387,271 |
| 9 | Gary & Karen Jackson Farms | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $2,332,242 |
| 10 | Rockhill Dairy LLC | Dexter, NM 88230 | $2,279,626 |
| 11 | Jones Dairy Inc | Veguita, NM 87062 | $2,260,009 |
| 12 | Cheyenne Dairy | Dexter, NM 88230 | $2,214,163 |
| 13 | Desertland Dairy LLC | Mesquite, NM 88048 | $2,134,669 |
| 14 | Creekside Dairy LLC | Dexter, NM 88230 | $2,089,715 |
| 15 | W R Johnson & Sons LLC | Columbus, NM 88029 | $2,071,052 |
| 16 | Massey Farms Inc Dba Massey Enterprises | Animas, NM 88020 | $2,050,632 |
| 17 | P7,llc | Roswell, NM 88202 | $2,003,753 |
| 18 | Haw Farms LLC | Belen, NM 87002 | $1,982,779 |
| 19 | Steven Lyles Farms Inc | Las Cruces, NM 88007 | $1,968,685 |
| 20 | Sideline Dairy LLC | Dexter, NM 88230 | $1,942,644 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf