Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 17,018

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 3rd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Frank Lucas) totaled $194,814,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2021
1Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$1,611,142
2Bank Of KremlinKremlin, OK 73753$1,217,650
3Farm Credit Of Western Oklahoma **Clinton, OK 73601$1,171,967
4Fischer & FischerHooker, OK 73945$640,298
5Steinert Farm Oper PartnershipFairmont, OK 73736$538,058
6G & T Farms PartnershipHugoton, KS 67951$533,676
7Reinschmiedt Fam Gen PrtnrshipGarber, OK 73738$525,646
8Stockmans Bank **Gould, OK 73544$489,630
9Russell Family PartnershipTexhoma, OK 73949$485,086
10Long Family Farms PrtnrshpOptima, OK 73945$475,768
11Gerald D BrakhageLahoma, OK 73754$441,811
12M M B FarmsTexhoma, OK 73949$440,906
13Sterrett Farms IncDexter, NM 88230$398,420
14Oklahoma Ag Credit **Watonga, OK 73772$395,196
15Farm Credit Of Enid **Enid, OK 73703$373,452
16Wooderson FarmsBlackwell, OK 74631$359,388
17First Bank & Trust **Perry, OK 73077$330,465
18Connie Lynn ClemansGuymon, OK 73942$327,840
19Alan James ClemansGuymon, OK 73942$327,840
20Higgins FarmElkhart, KS 67950$326,060

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag