Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Oklahoma
(Rep. Tom Cole)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Oklahoma (Rep. Tom Cole), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,521
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Oklahoma (Rep. Tom Cole) totaled $11,964,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tony W High | Walters, OK 73572 | $202,055 |
| 2 | Brad Wade | Ringling, OK 73456 | $126,769 |
| 3 | Gary L Carter | Waurika, OK 73573 | $125,131 |
| 4 | Oklahoma Ag Credit ** | Watonga, OK 73772 | $114,813 |
| 5 | Anthony Reed | Thackerville, OK 73459 | $108,764 |
| 6 | Pat Mcintyre Dba Mcintyre Farms Gp | Temple, OK 73568 | $103,153 |
| 7 | Jerry Thompson | Walters, OK 73572 | $100,740 |
| 8 | Jerry Joseph Johnson | Devol, OK 73531 | $97,377 |
| 9 | William Eugene Nunley | Marlow, OK 73055 | $96,970 |
| 10 | Rick Beard | Devol, OK 73531 | $96,950 |
| 11 | Joe Thompson | Temple, OK 73568 | $96,869 |
| 12 | W & S Dennis Production Company Ltd | Terral, OK 73569 | $92,835 |
| 13 | Bill Scott Adkins | Norman, OK 73070 | $92,159 |
| 14 | Brett High | Walters, OK 73572 | $87,718 |
| 15 | Bancfirst ** | Frederick, OK 73542 | $86,316 |
| 16 | Vache Operations LLC | Randlett, OK 73562 | $85,074 |
| 17 | Howard Ranches Inc | Waurika, OK 73573 | $84,198 |
| 18 | Ronnie Austin | Ringling, OK 73456 | $78,037 |
| 19 | Scott Laminack | Devol, OK 73531 | $77,259 |
| 20 | Donnie B Park | Burkburnett, TX 76354 | $74,775 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf