Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,748

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden) totaled $735,511,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2021
1Hoke RanchesPendleton, OR 97801$7,243,492
2Nolin Farming CompanyPendleton, OR 97801$6,989,917
3H M RanchHeppner, OR 97836$5,262,653
4Bureau Of Indian AffairsWinnebago, NE 68071$2,875,466
5Schomp RanchPendleton, OR 97801$2,866,225
6Fields RanchesWasco, OR 97065$2,757,751
7CtuirPendleton, OR 97801$2,646,293
8Rafter Zee RanchesIone, OR 97843$2,612,437
9Smith Family FarmsCondon, OR 97823$2,592,303
10Western GrainHeppner, OR 97836$2,571,493
11Wendell & Joyce ClodfelterGrass Valley, OR 97029$2,260,842
12Thompson LandHeppner, OR 97836$2,240,503
13A & K RanchesSan Francisco, CA 94118$2,198,230
14Eastern Oregon Investment ManagementLa Grande, OR 97850$2,156,280
15Jeff Cutsforth's FarmLexington, OR 97839$2,010,110
16Wolfe Hereford RanchWallowa, OR 97885$1,997,663
17Rupp RanchesRichland, WA 99352$1,967,923
18Richard A Peterson RanchIone, OR 97843$1,923,666
19Stangel Industries & Machine Shop PartnershipEnterprise, OR 97828$1,913,269
20James H & Darlene L NordquistThe Dalles, OR 97058$1,905,060

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag