Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Rhode Island
(Rep. James Langevin)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 178
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin) totaled $5,554,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prevail Fisheries Inc | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $250,000 |
| 2 | Karen Sue Inc | Wakefield, RI 02880 | $250,000 |
| 3 | Rjr Fisheries Inc | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $250,000 |
| 4 | Jessie Jean Enterprises | Peace Dale, RI 02883 | $250,000 |
| 5 | Heather Lynn Inc | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $247,828 |
| 6 | Salt Pond Fisheries Inc | Wakefield, RI 02880 | $194,553 |
| 7 | Relentless Inc | North Kingstown, RI 02852 | $187,500 |
| 8 | Campanale & Sons Inc. | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $171,941 |
| 9 | Good Shepherd Fisheries Inc | Charlestown, RI 02813 | $144,465 |
| 10 | Cedar Island Oyster Co | Saunderstown, RI 02874 | $141,466 |
| 11 | Vincent P Confreda | Warwick, RI 02888 | $130,401 |
| 12 | Mcglade Fisheries Inc | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $119,679 |
| 13 | Fox Fisheries Inc | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $116,269 |
| 14 | Rome Point LLC | North Kingstown, RI 02852 | $114,242 |
| 15 | Hard Bottom Fisheries | Wakefield, RI 02880 | $113,772 |
| 16 | Evening Prayer Inc | Montauk, NY 11954 | $112,368 |
| 17 | Jglr Incorporated | Exeter, RI 02822 | $111,320 |
| 18 | Seafarer Enterprises | Peace Dale, RI 02883 | $98,318 |
| 19 | Atlantic Queen Inc | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $95,932 |
| 20 | Tcm Fisheries Incorporated | Charlestown, RI 02813 | $90,131 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf